Dont renege on rent promise at Knickerbocker
One of the biggest problems with the federal $21 billion 9/11 community development aid package was that so little of it was used for affordable housing in Lower Manhattan. Much of the $50 million affordable housing fund the governor and mayor announced three years ago a fraction of 1 percent of the entire package still has not been spent, and some of the allocated money may not live up to the promise of preserving affordable apartments.
Knickerbocker Village, just south of the Manhattan Bridge between Catherine and Cherry Sts. near the East River, could become the most outrageous example. Cherry Green Management, Knickerbockers owners, are applying for steep rent hikes even though Governor George Pataki and Mayor Mike Bloomberg announced last year that the firm would get $5 million in federal money for capital repairs to keep the aging complex affordable.
I am proud that
we will be able to provide more affordable housing options and add to Downtowns thriving residential community, Pataki said in a statement in June 2005. His Division of Housing and Community Renewal recently suggested approving a rent hike at Knickerbocker, which would translate into almost $100 more per month in a typical one-bedroom apartment. Many of the 4,000 tenants in the 12 buildings comprising the complex are elderly people on fixed incomes who dont have the option of working longer hours to satisfy their landlords greed.
Deputy Mayor Dan Doctoroff said last year the $5 million would be enough to keep Knickerbocker affordable permanently. There is little evidence to support that claim, particularly since Cherry Green, in addition to the rent hike application, is fighting in court to leave the Article IV program that keeps the rents at relatively reasonable levels.
Councilmember Alan Gerson was right to say earlier this month that Cherry Green is acting in bad faith by taking a subsidy and going for a rent increase.
It took Doctoroff and the city far too long to come up with the best way to spend the $50 million in affordable housing money controlled by the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation. Three years ago, Pataki and Bloomberg announced that the $50 million would go to Tribecas Site 5B to build 300 below-market-rate apartments. The city rightly halted the plan because it realized it was better to shift more of the money to preserve existing affordable housing, rather than pay more to build new apartments.
The plan, announced a year ago, has still not been fully outlined and Knickerbocker is another bad chapter in the long affordable housing saga in Lower Manhattan. The mayor should use the full force of his office to fulfill his promise to Knickerbocker. Pataki should order the D.H.C.R. not to approve a rent hike.
Keeping a promise to vulnerable tenants should be enough of a reason. But it is important to maintain a healthy mix of incomes in our community and to send a message to landlords not to abuse this program.