Volume 75, Number 38 | February 8 -14 2006

Editorial

Sensible zoning must be planned for north Tribeca 

The City Planning Department should begin to take the same type of community leadership role in north Tribeca that it has shown the last three years in adjacent Hudson Square and in the far West Village and on the Greenwich Village waterfront.

The Jack Parker Corporation has applied to rezone four waterfront Tribeca blocks to allow for tall, bulky buildings a few blocks south of Canal St. Amanda Burden, commissioner of City Planning, has shown passion for preserving and improving Manhattan’s waterfront and we hope to see her help protect river views and Tribeca sun in this last vulnerable stretch of Tribeca waterfront.

Parker, which controls one of the Tribeca sites, no longer wants to build over 200 feet, having dropped down to 160 feet. But the firm does want an outsized floor-to-area ratio of 7.5. High F.A.R.’s mean bulky buildings and if anyone wants to find out what a fat, ugly waterfront building looks like, head to the north and take a good look at Morton Square in Hudson Square, a project that was given a B.S.A. variance before the new zoning of Hudson Square, which ultimately affected only that neighborhood’s southern section.

Community Board 1 has been speaking with City Planning about rezoning the broader north Tribeca area, which would be far better than approving this four-block area to benefit a corporation and a few property owners. The Lower Manhattan community board also favors residential zoning, a rational F.A.R. of 5 and height limits closer to 140 feet. This is the type of change the neighborhood needs.

The new zoning will allow developers to build residential buildings and street-level retail “as of right,” meaning no special variances or permits would be needed. Once residential zoning is approved, we expect to see projects developing Tribeca’s last frontier. Several projects are already in the works. Out-of-scale zoning is not needed to make this happen.

City Planning indicated two weeks ago that they were not likely to require Parker to prepare an environmental impact statement before they certify the plan, the first step in the approval process. Last week, the city was more circumspect on its plans not to order an E.I.S. City Planning merely has to determine the zoning change may have “a significant adverse impact” on the neighborhood before ordering a comprehensive E.I.S. — a threshold we’re confident has been met. Is Commissioner Burden ready to say she is certain these new large buildings will not affect the neighborhood’s environment?

City Planning should order Parker to do the E.I.S., while the agency’s staff should continue their consultation with C.B. 1 and other interested parties to come up with a sensible plan for all of north Tribeca. A successful example of a rezoning with broad community support is just across the street, in Hudson Square, and another is just a bit farther to the north, in the far West Village.

Reader Services




thevillager.com



Email our editor

ADVERTISING



Home

The Villager is published by
Community Media LLC.

The Villager | 487 Greenwich St., Suite 6A | New York, NY 10013

Phone: 212.229.1890 | Fax: 212.229.2790
Email: news@thevillager.com



Written permission of the publisher must be obtainedbefore any of the contents of this newspaper, in whole or in part, can be reproduced or redistributed.