• Calendar
  • Contests
  • Villager Blog
  • Jobs
  • Our staff
  • Media kit
    • Contact advertising
    • Specifications and sizes
  • Current print edition
  • Home delivery
  • Previously published
    • 2011
    • 2010
    • 2009
    • 2008
    • 2007
    • 2006
    • 2005
    • 2004
    • 2003
  • Buy a copy of The Villager
  • Get email updates
  • Classifieds
The Villager Newspaper
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • SPACES
  • Global Village
  • The Angry Buddhist
  • Progress Report
  • COLUMNS
  • CARTOONS
  • Talking Point I
  • Talking Point II
  • Gallery Seen
  • News
    • Community
    • Police Blotter
    • Education
    • Obituaries
    • Politics & Government
      • District One
      • District Three
      • Borough Pres.
      • Mayoral Race
    • Villager Videos
  • Opinion
    • CARTOONS
    • Reporter's Notebook
    • Talking Point
    • Notebook
    • Guest Editorial
    • Columns
      • jack wells
      • Leaders
      • LENORE SKENAZY
      • Books
      • Eats
      • Technology
      • People
      • Pet Set
      • Spin City
      • Clayton
      • Jerry Tallmer
      • Ira Blutreich
      • Evan Forsch
      • Flashback
      • Horoscopes
      • History
      • Youth
      • Sports
      • Health
      • Poetry
    • Editorials
    • Your Letters
    • Scene
    • Publisher
  • Arts
  • Scoopy's
  • In Pictures
  • Real Estate
  • Villager Blog
  • Special Sections
    • Film Fest
    • Sponsored Content
    • Why Pink?
    • Art Corner
    • 80th Anniversay
    • Pride
    • Meat Market
    • Progress
    • Union Square
    • Volunteers
    • Literature
    • Downtown Directory
      • From the publisher
      • Community Listings
        • Handicapped & Disabled Services
        • Health Services
        • Hotels
        • Legal & Financial Services
        • Neighborhood Associations
        • Police
        • Political Organizations
        • Post Offices
        • Public Officials
        • Recreation
        • After School Programs, Daycare and Nursery Schools
        • AIDS Services
        • Business Associations
        • Cultural Organizations
        • Education Colleges & Universities
        • Educational Services
        • Libraries
        • Museums & Attractions
  • Jobs
  • RSS for Entries

‘Gansevoort Row’ put on hold as judge stays project pending ruling

February 16, 2017 | Filed under: News | Posted by: The Villager
An earlier design for the "Gansevoort Row" project, left, and the latest version, right. The revisions were in response to critiques from the Landmarks Preservation Commission, which has approved the new design.

An earlier design for the “Gansevoort Row” project, left, and the latest version, right. The revisions were in response to critiques from the Landmarks Preservation Commission, which has approved the new design.

BY DENNIS LYNCH | A state judge last Thursday ordered that a developer hold off on work on a large-scale project in the southern end of the Gansevoort Market Historic District until the conclusion of a preservation group’s lawsuit against both the developer and the city’s Landmarks Preservation Commission for approving the project.

Aurora Capital Associates and William Gottlieb Real Estate want to demolish the one- and two-story buildings from 60-68 and 70-74 Gansevoort St. to build multistory commercial buildings that they have dubbed “Gansevoort Row.” They also plan to renovate 50 Gansevoort St. at the corner of Greenwich St., but that project is not included in the suit.

Now that will all have to wait until at least after the next hearing on March 8, when lawyers from both sides will argue their cases and present expert witnesses. The judge may make a decision in the weeks after that hearing, although the suit could drag on longer.

The preservation group Save Gansevoort is behind the suit and wants the judge to “annul, vacate and reverse” L.P.C.’s June 2016 decision that gave the developers the green light.

The group’s legal petition argued that allowing the project to go forward would destroy the Meat Market district’s historic character and resign it “to the status of a neighborhood that includes a hodgepodge of buildings of different scale.”

Michael Hiller, Save Gansevoort’s attorney, said he has three prominent witnesses, including Jay Shockley, who in 2003 wrote the roughly 140-page Gansevoort Market Historic District report for L.P.C. The report forms the basis for the area’s landmarking and meticulously breaks down the history and significance of each building in the district.

A classic Meatpacking District scene on the block of Gansevoort St. that developers are hoping to radically transform with new construction and the addition of stories.

A classic Meatpacking District scene on the south side of Gansevoort St. that developers are hoping to radically transform with new construction and the addition of stories.

The buildings in question date from and just after 1938 “during the last major phase of development of the district,” when a bank foreclosed on 60-74 Gansevoort St., according to Schockley’s report. Back then, the new owners essentially chopped off the top floors of the tenement buildings there and converted the remaining one- and two-story buildings for wholesale, market and depot space.

The current developers argue that their proposed buildings restore that pre-1938 multistory character to the block. L.P.C. signed off on the design for an 82-foot-tall building and a 62-foot-tall building at the sites.

Hiller called the developers’ argument “laughable.” He noted that while the Meat Market area experienced four periods of change over a 175-year period, the “snapshot” of history that L.P.C. intended to preserve with its 2003 designation was “the period of rapid market industrialization in the first half of the 20th century,” not the tenement period before that.

“The relevance of the tenement buildings was that they were replaced and retrofitted as market buildings rather than demolished,” Hiller explained.

Shockley noted in his designation report that the building at 60-68 Gansevoort St., which “has significant fabric reflecting its 1940 alteration, contributes to the historically-mixed architectural character and varied uses — including market-related functions — of the Gansevoort Market Historic District…[and] further contributes to the visual cohesion of the district through its brick and stone facade and metal canopy.”

He deemed 70-74 Gansevoort St. as not being architecturally significant. However, Hiller said that does not preclude that structure from being historically significant.

L.P.C. approved the Aurora and William Gottlieb projects at each address with an 8-to-2 vote. The commission appeared to disagree somewhat with Hiller’s assessment. In a document following its approval, the commission noted that, “while the low-scale of this portion of the block is reflective of the third phase of district development, this block contains buildings which do not contribute to the character of the historic district, specifically the building at 70-74 Gansevoort Street.”

The commission also noted that the district already has some buildings at the scale of the proposed new buildings, and that to minimize visual impact, the project’s taller buildings were located away from the crucial intersection of Gansevoort and Little West 12th Sts. and Ninth Ave.

Zack Winestine, a leading member of Save Gansevoort, said he feels L.P.C. has become “increasingly loose and sloppy” in implementing the standards in its historic district designation reports. He worried that the Gansevoort St. development plan would pave the way for more projects like it in the historic district. He wants to set the opposite precedent with a win in court.

“Our hope is that, if we win, it will send a very strong signal,” he said. “The fact that there’s this degree of opposition and that we’ve been able to mount a serious legal case will hopefully send a message to Landmarks that they need to be more careful about making decisions that can’t be justified under the designation report.”

The development project isn’t popular with local politicians or Community Board 2. The community board unanimously voted down an earlier, more drastic redevelopment plan in 2015. Congressmember Jerrold Nadler, state Senator Brad Hoylman, Assemblymember Deborah Glick, Borough President Gale Brewer and Councilmember Corey Johnson have all opposed the development.

The development team behind the project is also behind the troubled 9-19 Ninth Ave. project less than a block away from Gansevoort St. That project was marred by the death of a construction worker in 2015 when a trench caved in, and issues with the Department of Buildings, which said the new building was too big and, as a result, may not get a certificate of occupancy.

The next hearing on the Gansevoort Row project will be at Manhattan State Supreme Court, at 60 Centre St., between Worth and Pearl Sts., Room 345, Wed., March 8, at 2:15 p.m.

 

The Villager encourages readers to share articles:
Tweet

Advertisers from our print edition



Comments are often moderated.


We appreciate your comments and ask that you keep to the subject at hand, refrain from use of profanity and maintain a respectful tone to both the subject at hand and other readers who also post here. We reserve the right to delete your comment.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.


one × = 2

Search The Villager


Share This Post

Tweet


Sponsors

Sponsor


ClickHereForCalendarButton
ClickHereForCalendarButton

RSS Gay City News

  • Herman Bell and the Future of NYS Parole
  • Can Three Parents Make a Family in New York?
  • Federal Court Orders Trial on Trans Military Ban

RSS Chelsea Now

  • Tribeca Film Festival Review: “Sidelined”
  • Tribeca Film Festival Review: “Slut in a Good Way”
  • “Nico, 1988” at the Tribeca Film Festival: 2 Reviews

RSS Downtown Express

  • Tribeca Film Festival Review: “Sidelined”
  • Tribeca Film Festival Review: “Slut in a Good Way”
  • “Nico, 1988” at the Tribeca Film Festival: 2 Reviews
  • High impact: Could ‘developmental impact fees’ ease Downtown’s growing pains?
  • Back on the beat: Community policing program comes to the First Precinct
  • Police Blotter: Week of April 19, 2018
  • Beware the Coarsening

RSS East Villager News

  • Best in Screen, 2015
  • A Coney Island of the East Village at City Lore
  • NYCHA will build on ‘hot’ East Side, chief assures
  • After 50 years, famed fashionista Patricia Field closing Downtown store
  • God’s Love We Deliver is back and cooking again in its gleaming new Spring St. building
  • Scoopy’s, Week of Sept. 3, 2015
  • ‘N.Y. Corporate U.’ is crushing us, critics cry
  • Foodies steamed after wonton rent hike, taxes force out Charlie Mom
  • Crusty punk whose pit bull terrorized East Village is dead
  • Spring forward to fall festivals

NYC Community Media LLC also publishes:
The Villager • Gay City News • Chelsea Now • East Villager News


ONE METROTECH, 10TH FLOOR NORTH
NYC, NY 11201
Main Telephone: 212-229-1890
Fax: 212-229-2790
Advertising: 212-229-1890

© TheVillager.com (Copyright 2017). Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to TheVillager.com with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Log in - The Villager - Published by NYC COMMUNITY MEDIA