De Blasio seems on same page with evicted news vendor

Jerry Delakas has operated the newsstand at Astor Place and Fourth Ave. for 27 years. File photo by Jefferson Siegel

Jerry Delakas has operated the newsstand at Astor Place and Fourth Ave. for 27 years.                             File photo by Jefferson Siegel

BY LINCOLN ANDERSON | Updated Wed., Jan. 8, 11 p.m.  |  The news could be looking much better for embattled Astor Place newsstand vendor Jerry Delakas under a new administration.

Arthur Schwartz, Delakas’s attorney, reported that Mayor Bill de Blasio was very sympathetic to Delakas’s plight when the vendor met him at a “public open house” the mayor recently held at Gracie Mansion.

According to Schwartz, Delakas and Kelly King, an East Village artist and journalist, waited patiently in line to see the mayor. They brought along with them a small-scale model of Delakas’s newsstand as a “housewarming gift.”

The actual newsstand was recently padlocked by the Department of Consumer Affairs in the waning days of former Mayor Bloomberg’s administration. D.C.A. charged that Delakas, though he had been operating the stand for decades, never formally held the license. But Delakas says the license’s last owner willed it to him.

“This is Jerry Delakas,” King reportedly told the mayor. “He had a newsstand on Astor Place for 27 years and was beloved of the neighborhood, and it’s been taken away from him by the Department of Consumer Affairs.”

De Blasio reportedly responded, “I know the stand, it’s great. And I know the issue well — it’s a great injustice.” He then shouted to an aide, “It’s most important. Get on this right away.”

Kelly presented the aide with the docket number and a press kit with an article on Delakas.

On Tuesday, The Villager reached out to de Blasio’s press office for comment on whether the popular senior vendor, 64, has a chance, under a new administration, to return to his longtime newsstand.

The answer sounded encouraging.

“We are working to reach a better outcome,” responded De Blasio’s press secretary Phil Walzak.

Delakas and Schwartz appeared in court Wednesday morning to request that Delakas be allowed to operate the newsstand once again while his appeal proceeds. But the court proceeding was delayed 15 days.

On Tuesday night, Schwartz and Marty Tessler, a former Community Board 2 member who lives near the newsstand and has championed Delakas’s cause, filed a new application at D.C.A.’s licensing bureau for Delakas for the newsstand — since Schwartz now thinks that may be the best way to proceed. Schwartz said, at first, the D.C.A. staffers refused to accept the materials, claiming they couldn’t.

“You would have thought we were handing them a radioactive packet,” he said.

Earlier, Schwartz spoke to two top D.C.A. attorneys who for the past four years have been fighting to evict Delakas from the Astor Place stand. Schwartz noted to them that de Blasio clearly seems supportive of the ousted vendor.

“I told them, ‘You know, he’s your boss,’” Schwartz said. “It’s hard for lawyers to switch positions in midstream. But they’re going to have to — these are career positions.”

The Villager encourages readers to share articles:

Comments are often moderated.

We appreciate your comments and ask that you keep to the subject at hand, refrain from use of profanity and maintain a respectful tone to both the subject at hand and other readers who also post here. We reserve the right to delete your comment.

4 Responses to De Blasio seems on same page with evicted news vendor

  1. As sad as this guy's situation is, he did break the law. Reading above, four court decisions against him and de Blasio and his cronies want to overturn that? What kind of message does that send? That you can break the law and if there is public outcry and support, you get away with it? really? This new administration is going down a slippery slope if they plan to allow the guy to get off scott free. It'll open the doors for other fraudulent activities and backdoor deals. This shouldn't be about politics, but about the law. If you don't like the law, legitimately change it so it doesn't affect you but don't try to bypass it and think you are really going to get away with it.

  2. Why did the DCA waste time and money going after Jerry? Can the city get higher rent from someone else? Why didn't they just allow him to take over the lease, as the previous lease holders had allowed him to operate there in their name? I just don't get the city's motive for pursuing this, when there are so many bigger issues out there

  3. The Mayor spells his name de Blasio., not De. The story has it spelled both ways and the headline is incorrect.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


eight × 3 =

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>