Building planned on garden lot

Back in May, Kate Temple-West, one of the directors of the Children’s Magical Garden, at right, watched in dismay as workers fenced off the land owned by Hoyda.  Photo by Sam Spokony

Back in May, Kate Temple-West, director of the Children’s Magical Garden, at right, watched in dismay as workers fenced off the land owned by Hoyda. Photo by Sam Spokony

BY SAM SPOKONY | ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED NOV. 27, 2013  |  A developer has filed plans for a six-story, 70-foot-tall residential building on a contested lot that was part of a Lower East Side community garden for more than 30 years.

Supporters of the Children’s Magical Garden, at the corner of Stanton and Norfolk Sts., were dismayed this spring when Serge Hoyda fenced off part of the garden’s land that he purchased in 2003. The sliver has been privately owned for decades, according to city records, but it was used continuously by the garden.

Both before and after Hoyda fenced off the lot, supporters of the garden tried to convince him to agree to a “land swap” to keep C.M.G. fully intact.

But on Nov. 22, Hoyda’s representatives filed an application with the Department of Buildings, seeking approval to start construction. On Nov. 26, D.O.B. assigned a plan examiner to evaluate the application. A decision is pending, according to city records.

The address of the new building — with six full-floor apartments — would be 157 Norfolk St.

“The community gardeners are meeting after the Thanksgiving holiday to vote on the best solutions for the community garden, and for the many children who consider our garden to be their second home,” C.M.G. Director Kate Temple-West said in a Nov. 26 statement. “Soon we’ll be convening a town hall meeting to share our ideas with the wider community. We welcome and will hold a place at the meeting table for the developer.”

This summer, C.M.G.’s city-owned portion was included in the city’s GreenThumb program, giving it permanent community garden status.

The Villager encourages readers to share articles:

Comments are often moderated.

We appreciate your comments and ask that you keep to the subject at hand, refrain from use of profanity and maintain a respectful tone to both the subject at hand and other readers who also post here. We reserve the right to delete your comment.

5 Responses to Building planned on garden lot

  1. There's nothing to contest here. He owns the lot, It's zoned residential (this is an assumption, since there's no talk of filing for a variance), so he has every right to build on it. The garden people never bought the lot, so they have no say in the matter.

    BTW, expect to see more of this. The city, under Bla, is going to turn the screws on owners of empty residential lots to get them built. So any privately owned lots that are being used as gardens will like get build out.,

  2. that garden is haunted anyway

  3. Thank your re-elected councilperson, margaret chin…. for nothin'!

  4. Building on a garden? This is totally unfair.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


× 5 = forty

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>