Pols, public demand to be filled in on NYCHA infill plan

 

Monday’s informational meeting for Baruch Houses tenants drew about 100 people on a snowy, slushy evening.   Photo by Peter Mikoleski/NYCHA

Monday’s informational meeting for Baruch Houses tenants drew about 100 people on a snowy, slushy evening. Photo by Peter Mikoleski/NYCHA

BY LINCOLN ANDERSON |  Although local politicians, Community Board 3 and public housing residents are all calling for a slowdown in the process, the New York City Housing Authority is moving full-speed ahead with a plan to allow private “infill development” on eight of its Manhattan sites, including at five complexes in the East Village and Lower East Side. The new buildings would be rental, with a mix of 80 percent market-rate units and 20 percent affordable units.

NYCHA is set to release a request for proposals (R.F.P.) for interested developers late next month. According to a timeline being given out by the city, developers would be selected between August and November. Ninety-nine-year ground leases would then be signed for the parcels.

The infill buildings “could come online in four to five years,” according to Fred Harris, formerly of AvalonBay developers, who is overseeing this NYCHA development project.

Department officials say the scheme could generate $30 million to $50 million annually for the cash-strapped agency. Complexes where the new buildings are constructed would benefit by getting a share of the revenue to use for repairs and maintenance, plus would get emergency backup power in the case of blackouts — which would provide hot water, limited elevator use, security and hallway lighting.

The new affordable units would be permanently affordable.

The city’s plan is to lease sites for development within existing public housing complexes, including Baruch Houses, at East Houston St.; Campos Plaza, at E. 12th St.; LaGuardia Houses, at Madison and Rutgers Sts.; Smith Houses, at South St. and Robert Wagner Place; and Meltzer Tower, at E. First St.

This parking lot at East Houston St. and Baruch Drive would be developed with a new 405-apartment “80/20” building under the plan.  Photo by Lincoln Anderson

This parking lot at East Houston St. and Baruch Drive would be developed with a new 405-apartment “80/20” building under the plan. Photo by Lincoln Anderson

The Baruch site — now a parking lot on Baruch Drive — would allow one new building of 375,000 square feet with 405 apartments. The Campos property — currently a parking lot and a basketball and handball courts — would allow a 90,000-square-foot building with 97 apartments. The LaGuardia Houses parcels — which is right now two parking lots — is earmarked to become two new buildings with a total of 255,000 square foot and 276 new apartments. At Meltzer Tower, an outdoor seating area now used by the complex’s senior residents would be replaced by a 90,000-square-foot, 97-unit building. At the Smith Houses, there would be two new developments — to be located on the current sites of a paved baseball field and basketball court, parking lot and garbage-compactor lot — comprising more than 1 million square feet and 1,150 new units.

At an Assembly hearing on the plan last Friday, assemblymembers pushed John Rhea, the Housing Authority’s chairperson, and Harris for more information about the plan.

Brian Kavanagh, whose East Side district includes two of the affected housing complexes, accused the authority of “hiding the ball” on details about the infill plan.

Rhea said the idea is simply for NYCHA to “leverage one of our most valuable assets — our land.” Based on current zoning law, many NYCHA developments, he said, “have the ability to grow, and the ability to enhance their neighborhoods.”

Added Harris, “These areas are all located in areas that are dense, but we think could be a little denser.”

“Why are we rushing this?” asked Keith Wright, chairperson of the Assembly’s Standing Committee on Housing.

The authority is struggling financially, Rhea explained, having lost $2.3 billion in government funding since 2001, and is carrying an operating debt of $60 million.

A substantial part of the money from the new infill buildings will go toward fixing roofs, elevators, lobbies and boilers and upgrading security in the complexes where the new projects are sited.

“Every penny will go to the capital needs of NYCHA,” Rhea stated. “This represents the single, best way to raise the money — and the time to act is now.”

These capital repairs are separate from the agency’s backlog of apartment repairs, though this number is dropping, Rhea assured.

“This plan is specific to meet these [capital] needs — not the backlog,” he clarified.

The Housing chairperson said NYCHA has been talking about the idea of capitalizing on its land for more than a decade.

He added that the new construction projects “will bring $3 billion in economic activity and money to neighborhoods in need.”

Rhea said NYCHA residents would be given jobs in connection with the construction of the new buildings and then permanently, staffing them.

Rhea said it’s incorrect to dub the infill buildings “luxury housing,” rather, that they would be “mixed-income, 80 percent market rate.”

But Carmen Quinones, a Douglass Houses tenant activist who is running for City Council, who was in the audience at the hearing, didn’t agree.

“Eighty percent luxury housing!” she shouted out. Douglass Houses, on the Upper West Side, is also slated for the infill scheme.

In response to questioning about why the new infill buildings couldn’t have more affordable units, Harris said, NYCHA would “receive significantly less” if it went up from the 20 percent affordable figure.

As for eligibility for the affordable units, Rhea said NYCHA residents would receive priority and that applicants would have to earn less than 60 percent of area median income — $36,000 for a single person and $54,000 for a family of four. NYCHA does have middle-income residents, but they won’t be eligible for these new affordable units.

In response to accusations that NYCHA hasn’t done an adequate job informing its residents, politicians and the wider community about the plan, Rhea said the authority has been doing outreach, and is currently completing a round of tenant-outreach meetings, and that the plan will also go to local community boards for review. There will also be a second round of community outreach later on, he said.

A Web site on the infill plan is now live at http://on.nyc.gov/landlease , and will eventually let people post comments, though they can’t now.

However, Wright asked, “Will the horse be out of the barn [once the R.F.P is released]?”

“Absolutely not,” Rhea countered, saying, “What we’re trying to do is put down a track [for the horse].”

The Assembly panel — which also included Linda Rosenthal from the Upper West Side — grilled Rhea on whether there would really be a demand for the new market-rate units.

“There’s demands for all kinds of housing,” he assured, noting, “The city is pioneering micro-units, for example.”

Kavanagh pushed for details about the height of the new buildings. Harris and Rhea said that would be up to the developers to decide when they respond to the R.F.P. Could they be, for example, 50 stories tall? Kavanagh asked. Rhea said that would be very unlikely since it would result in a “pencil building.”

However, Harris later told The Villager that because the new buildings would have to be rental, they would likely not be extra-tall (which is not as cost-efficient), and would be “fatter” — similar to the buildings AvalonBay constructed in the Cooper Square Renewal Area, at Bowery and East Houston St. (including the building housing the Whole Foods Market and Chinatown YMCA and the one across the street adjacent to the Liz Christy Garden).

Kavanagh also said residents hope the new buildings would at least have ground-floor commercial uses, but Harris and Rhea said zoning doesn’t allow it.

A prevailing concern is that the new mixed-income buildings will open the door to privatizing the NYCHA complexes.

“Our headline is ‘Trojan horse,’” attorney Joel Kupferman told The Villager. He said he’s representing tenants at the Smith Houses.

BARUCH HOUSES MEETING
As part of the community outreach process, this past Monday night, Cecil House, NYCHA’s general manager, and Harris gave a presentation to Baruch tenants. About 100 local residents turned out for the presentation, at nearby Bard High School, on the snowy and blustery evening. Many of them have been living in Baruch for decades, if not their whole lives. House kept cool under fire as residents repeatedly peppered him with complaints about ongoing problems at the complex and lack of services, and slammed the new plan.

Baruch tenants complained about “rats as big as horses,” a lack of outdoor benches for seniors, problems with recurring sewage backups on the complex’s grounds and a “temporary sink” plan a few years ago that bombed.

Members of GOLES (Good Old Lower East Side) also protested that NYCHA pays $100 million annually to the city for police patrols, but that this should be free, and that if the agency could keep that money, it wouldn’t need any new infill buildings.

Damaris Reyes, executive director of GOLES and a Baruch resident, objected to the 80/20 breakdown, saying the formula should also include middle-income NYCHA residents.

“You’re saying to us that this is a proposal,” she said. “But ‘proposal’ to us means that we can negotiate. Many of our families are middle-income, being doubled- and tripled-up [in apartments].”

She demanded to know what the market-rate units’ rents would be.

Harris said studios would be more than $2,000 per month and one-bedrooms more than $3,000.

Reyes warned that adding new development would only exacerbate the complex’s sewage problem, noting, “Our infrastructure is antiquated — a new building will result in hundreds of thousands of flushes.”

But that issue wasn’t addressed, and, in fact, Harris noted there’s room at Baruch for even more than one new building.

“I’m hoping this will be so successful,” he said, “that in a couple of years you’ll come to us and say, ‘Please, give us another of these wonderful buildings.’”

Regarding concerns about parking, Harris said, the new buildings won’t be required to provide it. NYCHA residents who currently have parking spaces will be able to keep them, Rhea assured.

Councilmember Rosie Mendez noted that letters had been put up falsely saying the Baruch meeting was canceled. As a result, she called for another outreach meeting. House said they’ll consider whether to hold “a supplemental meeting.”

Mendez chairs the City Council’s Committee on Public Housing, which will hold a public hearing on the infill plan on April 5.

Last month, a group of local elected officials, including Kavanagh and Mendez, Congressmembers Carolyn Maloney and Nydia Velazquez, Assembly Speaker Silver, Councilmember Margaret Chin, Borough President Scott Stringer and state Senators Brad Hoylman and Daniel Squadron, as well as C.B. 3 Chairperson Gigi Li, wrote to Mayor Bloomberg and Rhea calling for “greater transparency” on the infill plan and a slowdown on issuing the R.F.P.

Last Friday, the mayor responded, saying that the plan “must be undertaken in close collaboration” with local residents, the community and elected officials, but not indicating there would be any change in NYCHA’s aggressive timetable.

Speaking after receiving the mayor’s response, Kavanagh told The Villager that, in fact, he doesn’t oppose the infill plan and actually thinks it’s “a good idea” for NYCHA to use its own property this way. But Kavanagh said he wants to make sure the new buildings “make sense in the context in which they’ll be built and that they’ll benefit the residents in these communities — if they get buy-in from the community.”

Also, he added, “NYCHA has to be more open and accountable than it has been in the recent past.”

The Villager encourages readers to share articles:

Comments are often moderated.

We appreciate your comments and ask that you keep to the subject at hand, refrain from use of profanity and maintain a respectful tone to both the subject at hand and other readers who also post here. We reserve the right to delete your comment.

4 Responses to Pols, public demand to be filled in on NYCHA infill plan

  1. NY State Courts must immediately stay all NYCHA evictions until it can be proven tenants have access to lawyers and the NYCHA documents required to understand rules, guidelines and policy.

  2. Number 1. Building upscale housing in the middle of a housing project is going to cost thousands for security to protect people who live here. I grew up in the Baruch Houses and it's very dangerous turf. What person in their right mind would want to go out at night and have to survive the gangbangers?
    Number 2. Taking away a small park where seniors who live in the Meltzer Apartments can relax is nothing short of criminal and disgusting as well. Do seniors need construction noise and no place to sit outside?
    Number 3. Building upscale buildings next to Campos where pollution from he asjoining Con Edison plant is constant– smoke pours out of their stacks day and night- will not attrAct one tenant concerned about their health.

  3. The NYCHA website describes the Meltzer Towers site as Site Area: 13,000 SF (Approximate)
    New Construction: 121,500 SF of Residential Floor Area (Approximate)
    18,500 SF of Commercial Floor Area (Approximate)
    97 New Apartments http://www.nyc.gov/html/nycha/html/preserving/lea

    This construction would evidently be contrary to the recently established East Village Zoning Amendment which places the site in a R8A district which allows a maximum 7.2 FAR and no commercial development allowed for that location. http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/html/evles/evles3.sht… This construction would have a total FAR of 10.7 including the prohibited commercial space, an astounding 50% in excess floor area above the legal limit.

    Whether NYCHA can legally disregard the Zoning Resolution remains to be seen. It would, nonetheless, demonstrate yet again this Administration's contempt for the entire community and its leaders who labored for several years to craft these hard won change to thwart out of control development. It would set a terrible precedent, potentially opening the door to legal challenges and exceptions to the ZR by other developers.

    This entire process, like the term limits debacle which resulted in a third term, has all the smell of the back door deal, and the abuse of process, accompanied by a smear campaign of hate inspiring articles toward the NYCHA residents in the press, including the NYTimes. It should be resisted by all clear headed members of the larger community.

  4. NYCHA has been funding the rerouting of water, gas, power lines and capitol improvements to these proposed new developments and developments that have been leased to private bankers and developers with capitol improvement monies that were suppose to go to NYCHA residents. If there is a budget deficit it is because of the misuse of funds and the corruption within NYCHA how is it that the persons that are directly running this project have more than doubled their salaries. These builders are all contributors to council persons that are allowing them to get away with corruption. NYCHA is for families that are unable to afford full market value. Why in the world would Margaret Chin allow this and not benefit the residents or the community. They are all rushing to get this done without any input from the community because their terms will all be up this year. And they will leave a mess to the next people coming into office to deal with the problems that are not addressed. I'm not against progress but if it benefits the rich developers and not the community, then I believe lawyers should be hired to protect the community. I still haven't heard of any one developer say we will improve parking, improve or create a recreation center, I still haven't heard we will take your seniors into consideration. All I hear is I want to take it all and you have no say, absolutely no say, no environmental studies have been done to find and inform the public how this will affect their schools, air quality, child care, parking, sunlight, trees, parks, commuting etc etc etc. La Guardia residents were informed that the monies will not fix their elevators or security, it will not make the area safer, it will not raise their parking. Hello rents are going up in May 2013 parking spaces are all going up some people in Rutgers Houses got a increase of 200% on their parking spaces. While they were told that since Citigroup leased ALL their building nothing would change. You cannot believe NYCHA they are pack full of lies!!!! Oh and how bout that 1 billion grant they received from the Fed Gov and are still sitting on it and now trying to play catch up on the thousands of problems residents have been begging them to address. They will now blow more money to play catch up and out sourcing all of these issue and 3x's the cost. NYCHA makes as much money if not more than any luxury building in NYC why and how they get away with the abuse of power and money is and should be investigated. What NYCHA needs is transparency just like any other agency and you will see how fast housing will improve!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


7 + one =

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>